‘Incidental results’ are health-related interpretations of a patient's genetic code that are unrelated to the principal reason behind ordering the genetic tests. For instance, if a clinician orders exome or genome sequencing to investigate genes related to a patient's cardiac condition, the laboratory will curently have information about the rest of the genes in hand and could examine genes for something similar to cancers predisposition with relative ease. Should a known or suspected mutation be found in a malignancy predisposition gene, the laboratory would survey this incidental results back to the ordering clinician, and the clinician and individual could do something to screen for cancer. However, in the lack of accepted suggestions about which variants to search for and which leads to go back to the clinician, laboratories have already been uncertain whether to search for or report outcomes beyond those that the physician ordered.The media won’t hear it, though. They glide through their rehearsed paces and pretend they are captains of information. Their elite owners would like to let the media ship decrease, rather than tell the truth. That’s understandable. In the end, these owners, and the owners who very own them, are guilty of a variety of crimes, the reporting of which would make rankings soar but eliminate their personal empires, reputations, and lives. Jon Rappoport The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX Uncovered, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional chair in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing and submitting articles on politics, medicine, and wellness for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other journals and newspapers in the US and Europe.